Bulletin n. 3/2015 | ||
January 2016 | ||
Méjean Aurélie, Lecocq Franck, Mulugetta Yacob |
||
Equity, burden sharing and development pathways: reframing international climate negotiations | ||
in International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics , Volume 15, Issue 4, November , 2015 , 387-402 | ||
Distribution issues have been critical in international negotiations on climate change. These have been framed as a ‘burden sharing’ problem since the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Three key difficulties are associated with this approach under a cap-and-trade system, namely the lack of consensus over what is equitable, uncertainty over estimates of policy costs, and lack of political realism and economic effectiveness of large-scale international transfers. These difficulties point to the risk of failure of post-2020 negotiations if these are based on the same premises of ‘sharing the emission reduction pie’ within a cap-and-trade regime. History has shown that different development paths can lead to similar economic performances with contrasted emission intensities. This paper proposes some insights into what could constitute a way forward, by recasting the discussion about emission reductions from a development perspective. It concludes that climate negotiations should depart from the current framework and shift to a debate focused on choosing a development path that would address domestic issues, while aligning pure climate policies with development policies. | ||