Bulletin n. 1/2008 | ||
May 2008 | ||
Banks Christopher, Blakeman John |
||
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Alito, and New Federalism Jurisprudence | ||
in Publius: The Journal of Federalism , vol. 38,n. 3, Summer - The State of American Federalism 2007–2008 , 2008 , 576-600 | ||
The Rehnquist Court returned power back to the states in rulings that scholars have dubbed "New Federalism." The appointments of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito invite speculation about the future direction of federalism cases in the Supreme Court. A survey of the Roberts Court's federalism rulings discovers that the ideological pathways of new federalism depend upon Justice Kennedy's swing vote and the effects the new appointments have on shaping voting coalitions in light of the vacancies they have filled. Although there is a reconfigured "States’ Rights Five" voting coalition, neither Roberts nor Alito endorses rigid viewpoints about federalism and it remains uncertain if the Court will return to the type of aggressive new federalism which arguably defined the legacy of the Rehnquist Court. | ||