Bulletin n. 3/2006
December 2006
CONTENTS
  • Section A) The theory and practise of the federal states and multi-level systems of government
  • Section B) Global governance and international organizations
  • Section C) Regional integration processes
  • Section D) Federalism as a political idea
    • Rosenfeld M.
    Comparing constitutional review by the European Court of Justice and the U.S. Supreme Court
    in International Journal of Constitutional Law , Vol. 4 n. 4 ,  2006 ,  618-651
    Although neither is a constitutional court, both the U.S. Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice engage in extensive constitutional review. While the European Union does not have a constitution, the European Court often engages in what amounts functionally to constitutional review, particularly in relation to the EU's quasi-federal structure. This article, comparing the two courts as constitutional adjudicators, explores the differences in style and rhetoric between the two, locating each in their respective institutional and cultural settings. It compares their approaches to interpretation as well as the source and scope of their legitimacy. Both courts have engaged in the constitutionalization of politics and seem at risk of politicizing their constitutions. The threats to their respective powers and legitimacy are, however, different. The U.S. Supreme Court is vulnerable to internal forces—the President, Congress, and national public opinion—whereas the European Court is mainly vulnerable to external forces—the member states and, particularly, the latter's constitutional courts.
    ©2001 - 2020 - Centro Studi sul Federalismo - P. IVA 94067130016